Sort paper by information sensitivity and retention status before deciding its waste route. Recyclability does not establish that disposal protects confidential information.
The facts behind the comparison
OAIC guidance says ordinary recycling is not ordinarily secure destruction of personal information. Its APP 11 guidance concerns covered entities and includes retention exceptions. Source: OAIC — Chapter 11: APP 11 Security of personal information.
What to compare
| Decision | Ordinary paper recycling | Secure destruction |
|---|---|---|
| Material decision | Use for paper cleared of confidentiality and retention concerns. | Specify documents authorised for destruction. |
| Collection container | Confirm accepted paper and contamination limits. | Require secure storage and an agreed custody process. |
| Evidence | Keep collection and destination information. | Keep authorised destruction and service records. |
| Downstream route | Ask what happens to the collected paper. | Ask whether destroyed material is recycled; do not assume it. |
Before you decide
- Apply your document retention and confidentiality policy first.
- Separate records that must be kept from records authorised for disposal.
- Get the provider’s acceptance and handling requirements in writing.
- Use staff instructions that distinguish recyclable material from information-handling risk.
What this comparison cannot tell you
Not every sheet of office paper needs a paid destruction service. Conversely, a recycling collection or sustainability claim is not evidence of adequate information security.
Related decisions
Explore the related comparison · Explore waste services
Discuss your waste setup with Bundle Waste.
Sources
- OAIC — Chapter 11: APP 11 Security of personal information. 11.29–11.34 and 11.49–11.50. Checked 18 September 2026.
Bundle Waste